Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Jury Report of Public Service Journalism 2007
Last year the number of applications for these awards was 521 and this year the receipt of 748 entries is noted as a considerably positive development. Four Provinces contributed more than a hundred entries each, namely Southern Province 134, Sabaragamuwa 123, Eastern province 111 and Central 105.
The lowest number of applications, that is 36, was from the Northern Province. It is the observation of the Jury that this is because of the various acts of threats and intimidation carried out by armed groups has resulted in a deep fear psychosis existing in this area. As a result most people are afraid to speak out in public and therefore the lives of journalists wishing to produce stories with proper sourcing has become extremely difficult. Also many journalists have left the profession, or fled the country or sought refuge underground.
In linguistic terms the largest number of applications was in the Sinhala Language, where there were 584 entries and the number of Tamil language entries was 160. Out of these 60 were from the East while the North contributed only 14. It is with regret we note that there were only 4 English language entries reflecting the fact that the English media does not pay much attention to Provincial reporting.
There were 54 entries from women journalists, but all of them came from a group of 14.
There were 9 Television entries and 71 Radio entries with the vast majority of 668 applications from the print media.
The consensus in the jury is that generally the entries did not reach a very high standard. However there was a genuine attempt at public service and we did not observe a serious breach of ethics in any of the entries.
When considering Print media entries the jury decided to ignore headlines that were in the articles as we assumed the headlines were the work of sub-editors at the desk and not put in there by the applicant. We wish to note this as there were instances when the headlines clearly violated media ethics.
The jury also noted that the different media, Radio, Television and Print had varying impacts, and therefore recommends that the organisers award different awards in these categories at the next award ceremony.
It is also agreed that the organisers should publicise the criteria on which the marks were awarded.
Anoma Rajakaruna
Arjuna Ranawana
Dushiyanthini Kanagasabapathipillai
Sanath Balasuriya
N.M. Ameen
S.Sivakumar
Uvindu Kurukulasooriya
The lowest number of applications, that is 36, was from the Northern Province. It is the observation of the Jury that this is because of the various acts of threats and intimidation carried out by armed groups has resulted in a deep fear psychosis existing in this area. As a result most people are afraid to speak out in public and therefore the lives of journalists wishing to produce stories with proper sourcing has become extremely difficult. Also many journalists have left the profession, or fled the country or sought refuge underground.
In linguistic terms the largest number of applications was in the Sinhala Language, where there were 584 entries and the number of Tamil language entries was 160. Out of these 60 were from the East while the North contributed only 14. It is with regret we note that there were only 4 English language entries reflecting the fact that the English media does not pay much attention to Provincial reporting.
There were 54 entries from women journalists, but all of them came from a group of 14.
There were 9 Television entries and 71 Radio entries with the vast majority of 668 applications from the print media.
The consensus in the jury is that generally the entries did not reach a very high standard. However there was a genuine attempt at public service and we did not observe a serious breach of ethics in any of the entries.
When considering Print media entries the jury decided to ignore headlines that were in the articles as we assumed the headlines were the work of sub-editors at the desk and not put in there by the applicant. We wish to note this as there were instances when the headlines clearly violated media ethics.
The jury also noted that the different media, Radio, Television and Print had varying impacts, and therefore recommends that the organisers award different awards in these categories at the next award ceremony.
It is also agreed that the organisers should publicise the criteria on which the marks were awarded.
Anoma Rajakaruna
Arjuna Ranawana
Dushiyanthini Kanagasabapathipillai
Sanath Balasuriya
N.M. Ameen
S.Sivakumar
Uvindu Kurukulasooriya